6,748 guests

World Health Organization’s faux pas on vaccine’s adverse events, deaths

  • Written by Catherine J. Frompovich
  • Published in Nation
  • Read: 160

The  United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have maintained their Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS ) since the late 1980s, almost like a post-marketing survey/analysis, since no one probably pays attention to all the adverse events reported, or actually is doing something to correct what is chemical abuse to children.  

Is that what consensus vaccine science amounts to?
Even more importantly, we find confirmation of damages awarded by the Vaccine Court Masters, plus attorneys’ fees, which now total $3.56 BILLION.
What I think readers really ought to understand is vaccine awards went from $1,371,761.92 for fiscal year 1989 to $230,140,251.20 for fiscal year 2016.  
Fiscal year 2017 seems to be lagging behind in postings and updates.  
What do those 2016 payout figures for “Petitioners’ Award Amount” shout out?  
There’s an almost 230 times increase in vaccine damages paid from FY 1989 to FY 2016!  
So, what’s going on?
It appears more vaccinees are experiencing post-vaccination damage.  
However, mandatory vaccine reporting may not be submitted to VAERS with subsequent filings to the Vaccine Court.  
However, there is a most significant data bank, which emerges from Page 5 of the HRSA reports, insofar as DEATHS are recorded as filed and attributed to vaccines and their adverse events.  
I encourage readers to check out Page 5 to understand the gravity of what’s going on within the World Health Organization stating vaccines cannot cause death!
According to that HRSA report, here are the deaths as reported: Vaccines: DT 9; DTP 696; DTP-HIB 8; DTaP 80; DTap-HepB-IPV 30; DTaP-HIB 1; DTaP-IPV-HIB 18; Td 3; Tdap 2; Tetanus 2; Hepatitis A 6; Hepatitis B 56; HIB 3; HPV 14; Influenza 115; IPV 14; OPV 28; Measles 19; Meningococcal 2; MMR 58; MMR-Varicella 1; Pertussis 3; Pneumococcal Conjugate 9; Rotavirus 1; Rubella 4; Varicella 9; nonqualified-1 9; and unspecified-2 9, for a total of 1,209 deaths and 16,523 injuries.
But there’s a snake in the woodpile regarding those statistics.  
Only 5,143 claims were compensated while 10,169 were dismissed!  
An absolute disgrace since the 1986 law passed by Congress has not been honored in its fullest intent, i.e., everyone harmed by vaccines will be compensated.
However, the more the Vaccine Court Masters can “cheat” damaged vaccinees out of what’s rightfully due to claimants, the more the U.S. Treasury can deposit and keep from the taxes paid on each vaccine sold!
I’ve written about that and even tried shaking it down at Treasury, only to be totally disregarded.          
What does that tell you?
Another thing happening with vaccine information and data is the Internet is being sanitized of incriminating vaccination information and one is most likely to receive the following prompt from numerous search engines: Page Not Found;  404 The page you’re looking for is not available; or It has been moved, removed or temporarily taken off-line.
What is totally incomprehensible to me, who has been researching and studying vaccine damages since they first started appearing via moms telling doctors I either knew or worked with that their children were damaged after receiving a vaccination!  
That began in the late 1980s.  
No doctor knows a child better than a mom who has given birth to and lovingly cared for her child.
However, the white coats have not been faithful to their Hippocratic Oath: First, do no harm.  
Vaccines contain inordinate amounts of neurotoxic chemicals and heavy metals, plus there have been no long-term studies proving vaccines -- just short term studies for vaccine licensure -- only a religious-like belief system of consensus science that vaccines cannot cause harm or even death, and any adverse vaccine event is a “coincidence.”
The World Health Organization (WHO) has a huge can of worms to deal with regarding its 2013 pontification and “new methodology to classify adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in March 2013.”
In July 4, 2017, two Indian medical personnel published a “letter stating that the methodology was flawed.”  It was published in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.
The critical and flawed issue involved is:

According to the two, WHO’s new classification, in essence, implies that no death can result from vaccination and, if any death does occur, it is  only coincidental and not due to the vaccine.   This, they say, does not address children’s safety.  
Here is the letter published by Jacob Puliyel, a pediatrician and member of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation, and Anant Phadke, an executive member of the All India Drug Action Network, who have expressed their concerns over the new system for classifying AEFI.    To be continued

(About Catherine J. Frompovich: She is is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.)