With both the prosecution and defense panels laying down their game plans, the first two days of the historic impeachment trial of Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona clearly belonged to Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile.

Enrile imposed discipline, asserted the supremacy of the Senate on all matters related to the impeachment, and ruled firmly but fairly.

If the prosecution scored on the first day of trial, the second day belonged to the defense by default because the prosecutors seemed  unprepared and tentative on points of law and procedure.

A challende presented by Senate Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano to Enrile’s ruling disallowing subpoenas to be issued to Corona’s family to testify against the Chief Justice was thrown out by the senator-jurors, 14-6.  The vote sustained Enrile’s ruling to disallow the subpoenas.

In his opening remarks on Monday, Enriule reminded all parties to the trial that not even the so-called sovereign will of the people could stop the Senate from doing its job to “do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws” of the land.

Enrile said the sovereign people speaking through the Constitution gave the Senate the sole authority to try impeachment cases and the Senate will finish the job justly, speedily, impartially and according to each senator’s conscience.

Senate supreme

Enrile said: “The task at hand is a constitutional mandate and duty which we have no discretion to postpone or evade. As jurors, it is our obligation and responsibility to closely and diligently examine the evidence and the facts to be presented before us, to determine whether such evidence and facts sufficiently and convincingly support the charges, and ultimately, to decide the fate of no less than the Chief Justice of the Highest Court of the land, and the head of a co-equal branch of our government.”

He continued: “Hence, by its very nature, the work we are about to do is unique. It is a rendition of justice outside our traditional judicial system and it carries with it a grave and serious responsibility. It deviates from our ordinary or normal functions and duties as legislators.

“The House of Representatives impeaches on the basis of its determination of the sufficiency of the charges both in form and in substance, and of the existence of probable cause, while the Senate bears the sole responsibility to try and decide whether to convict or to acquit the respondent in an impeachment case, that is, whether or not the respondent official deserves to be removed from the office he or she occupies, based on the grounds dictated in the Constitution.”

What ‘political’ means

Then Enrile delivered a policy statement that would guide the trial:

“While it has often been said that, by and large, the trial in an impeachment case is political in nature, nonetheless, such is neither an excuse nor a license for us to ignore and abandon our solemn and higher obligation and responsibility as a body of jurors to see to it that the Bill of Rights are observed and that justice is served, and to conduct the trial with impartiality and fairness, to hear the case with a clear and open mind, to weigh carefully in the scale the evidence against the respondent, and to render to him a just verdict based on no other consideration than our Constitution and laws, the facts presented to us, and our individual moral conviction.”

Enforcing strict discipline, Enrile said:

“I would like to remind the opposing sides, my colleagues, as well as the public and the media, that this trial will be governed by the Rules we have adopted. I therefore urge everyone to fully cooperate in the orderly conduct of these proceedings in accordance with the Rules, to demonstrate civility and to observe the decorum that is required for us to carry out our respective duties with dispatch, with honor and with dignity.”

Rule of Law paramount

Then he laid down the basic premises of the trial:

“As I preside over this impeachment trial, allow me to assure one and all that I am committed and determined to see this process all the way to its completion. Let us finish the job, for our Oath demands no less from us.

“Although the ostensible respondent in the trial before us is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, we cannot escape the reality that, in a larger sense, the conduct of this trial and its outcome will necessarily have a serious impact on the entire nation.

“Its success or failure to achieve the purpose for which the Constitution has provided this mechanism as part of our system of checks and balances and of public accountability, may spell the success or failure of our democratic institutions, the strengthening or weakening of our sense of justice as a people, our stability or disintegration as a nation, and the triumph or demise of the rule of law in our land.”

According to conscience

He concluded:

“The people’s faith in the Senate of the Republic, the image and the very fabric of our nation and our democratic system are at stake. Let us all take heed of the seriousness of this challenge and invoke the divine guidance of the Almighty God to enlighten our minds and guide our conscience in discharging faithfully our sacred duty.

“May God provide us with sufficient physical strength, intellectual keenness, and moral courage to render justice in the case before us on the basis of the law, our honest perception and understanding of the facts, and in accordance with the dictates of our individual conscience,” Enrile reminded  everyone.

On the first two days of the impeachment trial of Renato C. Corona, it was clear who was in charge.